论文部分内容阅读
本文是由2005年4月笔者在德国汉堡马克斯普朗克研究所(Max Planck Institute)作的一个学术报告改编而来。本文讨论了体育法是否作为一部统一的实体法而存在,还是仅仅取自于几个不同的法律领域(如合同法或侵权法)的某些条款的汇编而已。通过评价国际上关于这个问题的不同看法以及体育仲裁院(CAS)的判例,笔者突出强调了公法和私法的不同影响、特殊体育竞技规则的可诉性以及体育法对“权力下放原则”(允许成员针对影响自身的问题自作主张)(subsidiarity)的承认。本文还涉及了加
This article was adapted from an academic report by the author at the Max Planck Institute in Hamburg, Germany, in April 2005. This article discusses whether sports law exists as a unitary substantive law or is merely a compilation of certain provisions of several different areas of law, such as contract law or tort law. By appraising different international views on this issue and the case law of the CAS, the author highlights the different influences of public law and private law, the suitability of special sports rules and the principle of “decentralization” (Allowing members to assert themselves on issues affecting themselves) (subsidiarity). This article also covers the addition