论文部分内容阅读
目的观察和分析使用CT与超声对胰腺癌的诊断情况。方法对本院收治的30例患者进行随机分组,分成试验组和对照组,各为15例。对照组:使用CT进行诊断。试验组:使用超声进行诊断,比较两组的诊断情况。结果两组在诊断的符合率上,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05);但是,在判断肿瘤大小、腹膜后淋巴结转移时,对照组明显优于试验组,差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在显示胰腺管和胆总管扩张等征象时,试验组明显优于对照组,差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在对两组进行比较之后,采用B超和CT对胰腺癌患者进行诊断,各有优缺点。为了使其在临床诊断中发挥更好效果,合理而正确地利用,进一步提高胰腺癌的诊断率,在临床上对胰腺癌的及早诊断和及时治疗具有非常重要的意义。
Objective To observe and analyze the use of CT and ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Methods Thirty patients admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, each with 15 cases. Control group: using CT for diagnosis. Test group: the use of ultrasound diagnosis, comparison of the two groups of diagnosis. Results There was no significant difference in the coincidence rates of the two groups (P> 0.05). However, the control group was significantly better than the experimental group in determining tumor size and retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, with significant difference (P> 0.05) P <0.05). In the display of pancreatic duct and common bile duct dilatation and other signs, the experimental group was significantly better than the control group, the difference was significant, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion After comparing the two groups, the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer patients by B ultrasound and CT, each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In order to make it play a better effect in clinical diagnosis, rational and correct use, to further improve the diagnostic rate of pancreatic cancer in clinical diagnosis and timely treatment of pancreatic cancer has a very important significance.