论文部分内容阅读
在涉及损害赔偿的离婚诉讼中,法律明确规定无过错方在某些法定情形下可以获得经济补偿或精神赔偿。但由于婚姻中的侵权与一般侵权不同,取证主体,证据本身,取证方式等也均有所不同,并且我国的规范性法律文件并未对此类诉讼的举证问题作出详细规定,导致无过错方常常由于取证难导致败诉,获得赔偿的几率更是十分低下。本文认为适度的确认无过错方私人取证的合法性,公平分配诉讼双方的举证责任,采用更加合理的证明标准对于解决这一困境有一定的效果。
In divorce proceedings involving damages, the law clearly stipulates that no-fault parties may obtain financial or spiritual compensation under certain statutory circumstances. However, due to the infringement in marriage is different from the general infringement, the subject of evidence, the evidence itself, the way of evidence collection and so on are also different, and our country’s normative legal documents did not provide detailed provisions on the proof of such lawsuits, resulting in no fault Often, due to the lack of evidence, the odds of getting compensation are very low. This article considers that it is reasonable to confirm the legitimacy of private evidence collection without fault and to allocate the burden of proof on both parties fairly. Adopting more reasonable proof standards has certain effect on solving this predicament.