论文部分内容阅读
江藩撰写的《汉学师承记》历来被视为清代学术史的重要资料,但是在该书学术内涵的解读方面尚有待发之覆。此书的学术意义与作者的撰述动机密切相关。江藩撰写本书特别与阮元总辑《国史儒林传》一事有关,江氏的意图是要影响《国史儒林传》的编撰。由此江藩以正史的笔法和规模,在《汉学师承记》中构建了一个以“汉学”为正宗的清代儒学学术史,在此过程中他强化了汉宋门户之见,将主宋学者摒弃在外。正是因为其强烈的门户之见,《汉学师承记》才引起宋学者的激烈反对,但是因为具有正史的笔法和规模并得到阮元的支持,它得以对整个清代学术史的书写产生了巨大影响。
Jiang Fan’s “Han Scholar’s Note” has always been regarded as an important material for the academic history of the Qing Dynasty, but the academic content of the book has yet to be covered. The academic significance of this book is closely related to the author’s motivation of writing. Jiang Fan wrote this book especially with Ruan Yuan, the official editor of the “History of Confucianism”, Jiang’s intention is to influence the compilation of “History of Confucianism”. In this way, Jiang Fan established an academic history of Confucianism in Qing dynasty under the title of “Han Scholars” in the style and volume of his official history. In the process, Jiang Fan strengthened the opinions of Han and Song dynasties, outer. It is precisely because of its strong portal opinion that “scholar of the Han scholar” caused fierce opposition from the Song scholars, but because of the style and scale of the official history and the support of Ruan Yuan, it had a tremendous impact on the writing of academic history in the Qing Dynasty.