论文部分内容阅读
一位领导干部在民主生活会上,针对个别同志是非面前模棱两可、放弃原则的现象,严肃地指出:“党委内部该讲原则就要讲原则,不能用‘圆则’代替原则。”所谓讲原则,就是一切按规矩办事,是则是,非是非,泾渭分明,毫不含糊。而讲“圆则”恰恰相反,“曲率半径处处相等,磨擦系数点点为零”,圆通世故,是非不分。其实,推崇“圆则”的人,也并非没有原则,不讲原则便是他们奉行的原则。如有的遇着
At a meeting of democratic life, a leading cadre solemnly pointed out: “Principles should be emphasized in principle within the party committees, and principle can not be replaced by ’rules of the circle’”, in the light of the ambiguity of individual comrades and the abandonment of principle. , That is, everything is done according to the rules, yes, right and wrong, they are all distinct and unequivocal. On the contrary, “round the rule”, “the radius of curvature is the same everywhere, the friction coefficient is zero,” tactful, non-discriminatory. Actually, those who advocate the “round rules” are not without principles. The principle of pursuing them without respect to principle is their principle. If any encounter