论文部分内容阅读
2003年12月31日,国务院国资委.财政部联合公布了《企业国有产权转让管理暂行办法》.办法指出:企业的国有产权转让必须进行产权交易,并根据资产所属,在指定的产权交易所进行。曾经风起云涌的产权交易所。在一度沉寂之后,终于登堂入室。此番卷土重来,市场上究竟留有多大的空间?和生命力旺盛的场外股票交易市场相比。产权交易所有何不同,又有何优势?在我国建设多层次的资本市场体系中,产权交易所又该扮演怎样的角色?对于那些需要产权交易的企业,产权交易所又能发挥多大的作用? 《新财经》记者在北京、上海、西安等产权交易活跃的前沿地带进行了采访调研,得出的结论令人沮丧:原本应该为市场而生的产权交易所,却因为其浓厚的政策气味,而离市场越来越远.离十几年前的状况越来越近。一条看似创新的道路。却似乎踏上了一条复辟之路。
On December 31, 2003, the SASAC and the Ministry of Finance of the State Council jointly promulgated the Interim Measures for the Administration of the Transfer of State-owned Property by Enterprises, which stipulated that the transfer of state-owned property rights of an enterprise must be subject to property rights transactions and should be conducted on the designated property rights exchange get on. Once surging property exchange. After a moment of silence, finally entered the hall. This time comeback, the market actually left much space? And vitality over the OTC stock market. What are the advantages and disadvantages of property rights exchanges? What role should property exchanges play in the construction of a multi-level capital market system in our country? How much can property rights exchanges play a role in the enterprises that need property rights trading? Xinhua News Agency reporter interviewed in Beijing, Shanghai, Xi’an and other property transactions in the forefront of the interview conducted a survey, the conclusion was frustrating: originally should be born for the market property exchange, but because of its strong policy smell , Farther and farther away from the market, getting closer and closer to the situation a decade or more ago. A seemingly innovative path. It seems that embarked on a road to restoration.