我认识一名著名学者,他在从事大陆文学研究之余,也客串台港澳暨海外华文文学研究,但在我与他接触中,他从不认为自己是研究台港文学的,似乎一旦承认了这种身份,便会“掉价”降低其学术地位。这使人联想到在内地学界流行的说法:“一流学者搞古典,二流学者搞现代,三流学者搞当代,四流学者搞台港。”这显然 I know a famous scholar. While engaged in the study of Chinese literature, he is also a guest of Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao Studies of Overseas Chinese Literature. However, in my contact with him, he never considered himself studying Taiwan and Hong Kong literature. It seems that once he admitted This identity, it will “drop price ” to reduce its academic status. This is reminiscent of the popular saying in the Mainland: “First-class scholars engage in classical studies, second-class scholars engage in modern studies, third-class scholars engage in contemporary studies, and fourth-class scholars engage in research in Taiwan.”