论文部分内容阅读
目的探究快速检验技术在微生物检验中的效果及影响因素。方法随机选取我院收治的110例感染性疾病患者,分别采用传统人工微生物实验室检查技术、微生物快速检验技术对其进行检查,对比分析检查结果中病原微生物阳性率及检测技术敏感性、特异性等情况。结果快速检验技术检测结果阳性率与传统人工微生物实验室检查相比未见差异(P>0.05)。快速检验技术检测结果特异性、敏感性与传统人工微生物实验室检查相比明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论快速检验技术在微生物检验中的效果显著,准确率较高,检测所需时间短,具有较高敏感性及特异性,临床意义重大。
Objective To explore the effect and influencing factors of rapid test in microbial test. Methods A total of 110 cases of infectious diseases admitted to our hospital were randomly selected and tested by traditional artificial microorganism laboratory test and rapid microbial test. The positive rate of pathogenic microorganisms and the sensitivity and specificity And so on. Results There was no difference between the positive rate of the rapid test technique test results and the traditional laboratory test of artificial microorganisms (P> 0.05). The specificity and sensitivity of the rapid test technique were significantly higher than those of the traditional laboratory test of artificial microorganisms, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The rapid test technology in the microbial test results were significant, high accuracy, short test time, with high sensitivity and specificity, clinical significance.