论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨网络成瘾的人格特征及其父母养育方式。方法采用网络成瘾问卷(IAT)、父母养育方式问卷(EMBU)、艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)对76名网络成瘾者进行测试,并抽取76名非网络成瘾者进行对照分析。结果1网络成瘾组与对照组父母养育方式存在显著差异,网络成瘾组父亲的惩罚严厉(t=6.408,P=0.000)、过分干涉(t=3.334,P=0.001)、过分保护(t=2.783,P=0.006)和拒绝否认(t=2.81,P=0.006)4个因子分值显著高于对照组(P<0.01),父亲的温暖理解(t=-2.731,P=0.007)因子分值明显低于对照组(P<0.01);母亲的惩罚严厉(t=4.069p=0.000)、过分干涉保护(t=3.414,P=0.001)、拒绝否认(t=2.732,P=0.007)各因子分明显高于对照组(P<0.01);2网络成瘾组与对照组人格特征存在显著差异,网络成瘾组的精神质(t=5.74,P=0.000)、神经质(t=4.81,P=0.000)因子分值显著高于对照组(P<0.01),掩饰因子(t=3.93,P=0.000)分值显著低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论1网络成瘾者具有不良的父母养育方式;2网络成瘾者人格特征存在不同程度缺陷。
Objective To explore the personality characteristics of internet addiction and parental rearing patterns. Methods A total of 76 Internet addicts were tested by IAT, EMBU and EPQ, and 76 non-Internet addicts were selected for comparison. Results 1 There was a significant difference in parental rearing patterns between internet addiction group and control group. The father of internet addiction group had severe punishment (t = 6.408, P = 0.000), excessive intervention (t = 3.334, P = 0.001) (T = -2.731, P = 0.007) were significantly higher than those in the control group (P <0.01) The score of mother was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.01); mother’s punishment was severe (t = 4.069p = 0.000), excessive interference protection (t = 3.414, P = 0.001) There were significant differences in personality traits among internet addiction group and control group (P = 0.000), neuroticism (t = 4.81, P = 0.000) , P = 0.000) was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.01). The masking factor (t = 3.93, P = 0.000) was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.01). Conclusion 1 Internet addicts have poor parental rearing patterns; 2 The personality traits of internet addicts have different degrees of defects.