论文部分内容阅读
南京栖霞区54岁的退休女工祝玉英近年来厄运连连,2005年10月,丈夫患心脏病不幸去世;2007年4月20日,32岁的儿子葛明明驾驶单位车辆和儿媳成莉在上班途中发生车祸,双双殒命;成莉的父母以女儿人身损害为由在将葛明明所属的单位水泥厂告上法庭时,一审法院追加祝玉英为共同被告;法院审理认为葛明明驾车不是职务行为,判定祝玉英在儿子遗产范围内赔偿成莉的父母42万余元。然而,2007年12月10日,南京市中级法院推翻了一审判决,42万余元赔偿金改判由水泥厂全部承担。二审判决为何大翻盘呢?
Nanjing Qixia District, 54-year-old retired female workers Zhu Yuying doom again and again in recent years, in October 2005, her husband died of heart disease unfortunately; April 20, 2007, 32-year-old son Ge Mingming driving vehicles and daughter-in-law Cheng Li on the way to work In the event of a car accident, both died; Cheng Li’s parents to daughter personal injury grounds in Geming Ming unit cement plant to court, the court of first instance additional Zhu Yuying as a co-defendant; court held that Ge Mingming driving is not a job, determine Zhu Yuying compensation in the area of his son Cheng Li’s parents 42 million yuan. However, on December 10, 2007, the Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court overturned the verdict of the first instance and the compensation of more than 420,000 yuan was entirely borne by the cement plant. Why did the second instance decision comeback?