论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法第236条第二款规定,奸淫不满十四周岁幼女的,以强奸论,从重处罚,而强奸罪的量刑幅度为三年以上十年以下有期徒刑(不考虑加重处罚的情形)。刑法第360条第二款规定,嫖宿幼女的,处五年以上有期徒刑,并处罚金。抗诉机关认为奸淫幼女的犯罪显然要重于嫖宿幼女的犯罪,以此认为奸淫幼女的处罚不应低于嫖宿幼女的处罚。用嫖宿幼女罪的量刑基准来类推适用,不利于被告人的类推解释,是被罪刑法定原则所禁止的错误的观点。本文以被告人沈某某强奸案为例,简要分析了强奸罪。
The second paragraph of Article 236 of the Criminal Law of China stipulates that if the adolescent fourteen years of age commit adultery, he shall be punished severely according to the theory of rape, while the sentencing range of rape shall be not less than three years and not more than ten years (irrespective of the aggravating circumstances). Paragraph 2 of Article 360 of the Criminal Law stipulates that young girls who take prostitution shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years and shall be fined. The protest authority believes that the crime of adulteress girl is obviously more important than the crime of whoring young girls, so that the penalty for adulteress girl should not be less than the punishment of whoring young girl. It is unfavorable to the defendant’s analogical interpretation by using the sentencing criteria of the crime of whoring girls and young girls for analogy. It is a wrong viewpoint that is prohibited by the principle of legally prescribed punishment. In this paper, the defendant Shen Mou rape case, a brief analysis of the crime of rape.