论文部分内容阅读
西方文论并不是一个有机统一的整体,而是内部充满矛盾和异质性的文学范式的斗争场。世界中心论、作者中心论、文本中心论与读者中心论等四种文学范式在洞察文学本质属性的同时,也在否定和遮蔽其他文学范式研究。某一范式按照其自身学理逻辑发展有其科学性的一面,但在其一体化和强制阐释冲动下最终走向自身的反面和衰落,这就是西方文论范式的异质化问题。由于我们共时性译介和引进历时发展的西方文论范式,导致在中国文论建设中无法消化,反而凸显了其范式间的异质性。这一问题在给中国文论建设带来挑战的同时,也为我们建设开放性的文论体系提供了借鉴。
Western literary theory is not an organically integrated whole, but a field of struggle full of contradictions and heterogeneity. Four kinds of literary paradigms, such as world center theory, author center theory, textual center theory and reader-center theory, are also negating and obscuring the study of other literary paradigms while they also reveal the essential nature of literature. A certain paradigm has its own scientific aspect according to its own logic of logic development. However, under the impulse of its integration and compulsory interpretation, its ultimate opposite and its decline are the paradoxes of the paradigm of Western literary theory. Because of our synchronic translation and introduction of the diachronic development of the Western literary paradigm, which leads to the inability to digest Chinese literary theory, it highlights the heterogeneity of its paradigm. While this issue posed a challenge to the construction of Chinese literary theory, it also provided a reference for our building an open literary theory system.