论文部分内容阅读
如一次鸦片战争,拥有80万军队的中国,竟然败给了开始不过4000、最多也只有不足两万人的英国远征军。长期以来,人们不断探求中国战败的种种原因,从政治、经济、军事多方面进行分析,这自然都是正确的。本文试图在总的战略原则和具体的战术上作些考察,探讨中国失败的教训。第一次鸦片战争中的数十次战役,中国多次失败,也有一些取得了胜利。这些战役的指挥者或象奕山、奕经、杨芳、余步云、琦善等,他们是清政府腐败官员的代表,对反侵略战争既不想打,又不会打,只是被动、盲目地应付一阵,给他们再好一些的战斗条件,他们也要失败。他们指
In the case of the Opium War, China, with 800,000 troops, was defeated by the British expeditionary force, which started at a mere 4,000 but with a maximum of less than 20,000. For a long time, people constantly sought various reasons for the defeat of China and analyzed them from the political, economic and military levels. All of this is correct. This article attempts to make some observations on the overall strategic principles and specific tactics to explore the lessons of China’s failure. During the first dozens of battles in the Opium War, China repeatedly failed and some won. The commanders of these campaigns, such as Yi-shan, Yi-jing, Yang Fang, Yu Bu-yun, Qi Shan and others, are representatives of corrupt officials of the Qing government. They do not want to fight or fight against the war of aggression. They just passively and blindly cope with the situation , Give them a little better fighting conditions, they have to fail. They mean