论文部分内容阅读
我们将出版于上个世纪六十年代的三本中国文学史和出版于上个世纪九十年代末的三本中国文学史进行对比后发现,宋玉所占篇幅比例在缩小,独立一节的地位在消失,而对其作品大多仍只肯定《九辩》一篇。宋玉在文学史的以上方面的变化,有着较复杂的学术原因,主要原因是文学史家对宋玉的文学史定位过于单一,对宋玉著作篇目的确认没有充分吸收专家学者的研究成果,学者们对宋玉作品的艺术特色研究也还不够深入。
Comparing the history of three Chinese literatures, published in the 1960s, with the history of three Chinese literatures, published in the late 1990s, we find that the proportion of the space occupied by Song Yu is narrowing and that the independent section The status is disappearing, while most of his works still only affirmed the “nine defenses” one. Song Yu’s changes in the above aspects of literary history have more complicated academic reasons. The main reason is that literary historians place Song Yu’s literary history too unimportant. The recognition of Song Yu’s works did not fully absorb the research achievements of experts and scholars. Scholars Their research on the artistic features of Song Yu’s works is not yet deep enough.