论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比观察中国商环(以下简称商环)包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术的临床疗效。方法:选择择期包皮环切术100例,随机分为商环包皮环切组(观察组)和传统包皮环切组(对照组)各50例,比较两组手术时间、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后并发症、伤口愈合时间、术后外观满意度及诊疗费用等。结果:观察组和对照组手术时间分别为(4.65±1.30)min、(25.50±8.30)min,术后24hVAS评分分别为(1.80±0.85)分、(5.27±1.72)分;伤口水肿发生率分别为22.0%(11/50)、36.0%(18/50);伤口出血发生率分别为0%(0/50)、12.0%(6/50);伤口感染发生率分别为2.0%(1/50)、14.0%(7/50);伤口裂开发生率分别为8.0%(4/50)、6.0%(3/50);伤口愈合时间分别为(15.3±2.13)天、(10.5±1.82)天,术后外观满意度分别为98.0%(49/50)、76.0%(38/50);费用分别为(850±47.30)元、(545±23.00)元。以上结果除伤口裂开发生率差异不显著外,其余均差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:采用商环包皮环切术临床综合疗效满意。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of circumcision and traditional circumcision in China Commercial Circle (hereinafter referred to as Shanghuan). Methods: A total of 100 cases of circumcision were randomly divided into commercial circumcision group (observation group) and conventional circumcision group (control group), 50 cases in each group. The operation time, postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS), postoperative complications, wound healing time, postoperative appearance satisfaction and treatment costs. Results: The operation time of the observation group and the control group were (4.65 ± 1.30) min and (25.50 ± 8.30) min respectively, and the scores of VAS were (1.80 ± 0.85) and (5.27 ± 1.72) 24h postoperatively respectively. The incidences of wound edema were The incidences of wound infection were 0% (0/50) and 12.0% (6/50) respectively. The incidences of wound infection were 2.0% (1 / The incidences of wound dehiscence were 8.0% (4/50) and 6.0% (3/50) respectively, while those of wound healing were (15.3 ± 2.13) days and (10.5 ± 1.82) days respectively ) Day, postoperative appearance satisfaction were 98.0% (49/50) and 76.0% (38/50) respectively. The costs were (850 ± 47.30) yuan and (545 ± 23.00) yuan respectively. In addition to the above results except for the incidence of wound dehiscence difference was not significant, the other differences were significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The commercial ring circumcision clinical comprehensive effect is satisfactory.