论文部分内容阅读
目的比较超声引导下穿刺术与传统开腹手术治疗盆腔囊肿的临床疗效。方法选取我院于2015年5月~2016年12月收治的患有盆腔囊肿的116例患者作为实验对象,将其分为试验组与对照组,各58例。对照组实施传统的开腹手术医治,试验组实施超声引导下穿刺术医治。比较两组患者手术过程中的情况、治疗后的效果和手术后发生并发症的情况。结果试验组患者在手术过程中的出血量及手术用时均优于对照组,P<0.05;比较组间患者在经治疗后的疗效,试验组与对照组的总有效率分别是93.10%、63.79%,试验组比对照组高,P<0.05;组间患者的不良反应及并发症的发生率均较低,无明显差异,P>0.05。结论对盆腔囊肿的患者采用超声引导下穿刺术,临床效果理想,安全性好,应用前景广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided puncture and traditional laparotomy for pelvic cysts. Methods A total of 116 patients with pelvic cysts treated in our hospital from May 2015 to December 2016 were selected as experimental subjects and divided into experimental group and control group with 58 cases each. The control group underwent traditional laparotomy, and the experimental group underwent ultrasound-guided puncture. The two groups of patients during surgery, the effect of treatment and complications after surgery. Results The bleeding volume and operative time of the patients in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (P <0.05). The total effective rate of the experimental group and the control group after treatment was 93.10% and 63.79 %, The experimental group than the control group, P <0.05; between the two groups of patients with adverse reactions and the incidence of complications were lower, no significant difference, P> 0.05. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided puncture of pelvic cyst in patients with satisfactory clinical results, good safety, wide application prospects.