鉴定结论作为法定证据之一 ,在人民法院的审判活动中 ,发挥了其他证据不可替代的作用。但是 ,许多审判人员有把鉴定结论的证据效力绝对化的倾向 ,不经法庭质证或草率质证而一律采信 ,造成了一些案件的错误裁判 ,有悖司法公正。本文针对在鉴定结论法庭质证、审查判断方面的一些 As one of the statutory evidence, the appraisal conclusion plays an irreplaceable role in the trial of the people’s court in other evidences. However, many judicial personnel have the tendency of making the evidence validity of the conclusion of identification absolute. They have always taken the credit without the court’s testimony or the slogan of cross-examination, which has led to erroneous judgments in some cases and contrary to judicial fairness. This article aims to identify some of the judgments of the court in the identification of conclusions