论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析妊娠期急性阑尾炎采用两种方法的临床治疗效果。方法:将2013年11月-2014年11月期间收治于我院的妊娠期急性阑尾炎患者84例为研究对象,随机将其均分成观察组和对照组,每组患者各42例。对照组患者给予传统开腹手术治疗;观察组患者给予腹腔镜手术治疗。对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较分析。结果:经过不同的治疗方式后,观察组患者无论是手术切口、术中出血量以及住院时间都优于对照组(P<0.05),具备显著差异。结论:针对于妊娠期急性阑尾炎患者而言,选择腹腔镜手术治疗效果会明显优于开腹手术,能够缩短患者的住院时间,降低感染率,在临床中值得推广使用。
Objective: To analyze the clinical therapeutic effect of two methods in acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Methods: Eighty-four patients with acute appendicitis during pregnancy in our hospital from November 2013 to November 2014 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 42 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given conventional laparotomy; patients in the observation group were given laparoscopic surgery. The treatment effect of two groups of patients were compared. Results: After different treatment methods, the patients in the observation group were significantly better than the control group (both surgical incision, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay) (P <0.05). Conclusion: For patients with acute appendicitis in pregnancy, the choice of laparoscopic surgery is significantly better than laparotomy, which can shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce the infection rate. It is worth promoting in clinic.