论文部分内容阅读
2013年12月25日,针对优酷诉讼猎豹浏览器“屏蔽优酷广告”一案,北京市海淀区人民法院一审判决猎豹败诉,判赔30万元。而另据12月27日消息,猎豹浏览器对“优酷网针对猎豹浏览器进行限制视频播放”这一缘由反诉优酷,搏回一局。双方各胜一场官司,优酷诉猎豹拦截广告赢了30万元,猎豹诉优酷限制播放赢了20万元。表面上,优酷赚了10万元,只是这胜利却白白给竞争对手打了一次广告。优酷虽然号称中国的YouTube,但是在用户体验方面,却并没有遵循YouTube的脚步办事。在优酷对胜诉一事沾沾自喜之时,却意外遭受网友的炮轰。矛头自然
December 25, 2013, for the Youku litigation cheetah browser “screen Youku ad ” case, Beijing Haidian District Court of First Instance ruling cheetah lost the verdict, the judgment 300000 yuan. According to another message on December 27, Cheetah browser on the “Youku for cheetah browser to limit the video player,” the reason of counterclaim Youku, beat back a bureau. Both sides each won a lawsuit, Youku v. Cheetah intercepted advertising won 300,000 yuan, Cheetah v. Youku limited play won 200,000 yuan. On the surface, Youku earned 100000 yuan, but this victory has actually played an advertisement to competitors. Youku, although known as China’s YouTube, but in the user experience, but did not follow YouTube’s footsteps. Youku unexpectedly suffered net shelling when you were proud of winning the case. Spearhead natural