论文部分内容阅读
案例2011年10月,A县电业局向当地土地行政主管部门提交1994年A县人民政府划拨供地批文及其他相关资料,就其办公用地提出划拨用地登记发证申请。对此类历史遗留划拨用地如何发证?A县国土资源局意见分歧。分析A县国土资源部门在办理中,出现了三种不同意见。其主要分歧在于划拨供地批文的时效性,以及颁发划拨方式的土地证遵循依据。第一种意见:划拨供地批文无时间限制,可以依据划拨供地批文及相关资料颁发划拨方式土地证。
Case In October 2011, the A County Electric Power Bureau submitted to the local land administrative department in 1994 a county people’s government for approval and other relevant information for the allocation of land for their use of land registration and registration application. How to issue land for such historical legacy? A County Land Resources Bureau disagreement. Analysis A County land resources department in the handling, there have been three different opinions. The main differences lie in the timeliness of the approval of the land grant and the basis of the land certificate issued to allocate the land. First Opinion: There is no time limit for appropriating approval documents for land supply, and land certificates may be issued according to the approval document for allocation and relevant materials.