论文部分内容阅读
—元代是文人画十分兴盛的时期。著名画家倪瓒曰:“仆之所谓画者,不过逸笔草草,不求形似,聊以自娱耳。”与他同时代的吴镇也说:“墨线之作,盖士大夫词翰之余,适一时之兴趣,与夫评画者流大有寥廓。”语中“自娱”、“墨戏”、“适一时之兴趣”,都说明了文人画的宗旨乃在于兴之所至、信手涂鸦。但是,这里有个前提,那就是文人画的主体是文人。所以,他的自娱,也是文绉绉的自娱;他的墨戏,也是土大夫的墨戏;他的兴趣,也是“词翰之余”的兴趣。如果离开了这个前提,事情就会起变化。近来就听到一种“理论”,说“艺术便是人的本性在绝对自由状态下的宣泄。”这人的“本性”,本来就复杂得很,饿了要吃、冷了要穿,是人的本性;没钱花想办法抓钱,是人的本性;见了美人便想入非非,也是人的本性。如果都“绝对自由”地宣泄起来,那岂不抢劫、强奸、杀人、放火,都可以成为“艺术”了么?于是我忽发奇想,这样的“理论家”的家里,如果有
Yuan Dynasty is a very prosperous period of literati painting. Well-known painter Ni 瓒 said: “Servants of the so-called painter, but elegant pen, not seeking form, talk to entertain ear.” Wu and his contemporaries also said: “ink line, , The interest of the moment, and the great rate of the husband and the graffiti painter. ”The phrase“ entertaining ”,“ ink play ”,“ moment of interest ”all indicate that the purpose of the literati painting lies in its endeavor, Letter doodle. However, there is a premise here, that is, the main body of literati painting is literati. Therefore, his entertaining, but also self-entertainment creations; his ink opera, is also a doctor’s ink play; his interest, but also the “Cihan Yu” interest. If you leave this premise, things will change. Recently, I heard a “theory,” saying that “art is the catharsis of man’s nature under absolute freedom.” This man’s “nature” is inherently complicated, hungry, cold, It is human nature to spend money and find ways to catch money without money. It is the nature of human beings to see the beauty and the nature of human beings. If all are “absolutely free” to vent their efforts, will not robbing, raping, killing or arson all become “art”? So I suddenly wondered if such a “theorist” home, if there is