目前,关于热力学第二定律的讨论基本上有两种意见,前一种意见认为热力学第二定律的克劳胥斯或开尔文说法本身蕴含着运动要逐渐消灭的思想,是根本违反辩证唯物主义哲学原理的,必然导致“热寂说”;批判“热寂说”必须从热力学第二定律本身开始,否则就不能击中要害。后一种意见认为“热寂说”是一种反动谬论,但热力学第二定律本身并没有错,错就错在克劳胥斯等人从资产阶级唯心主义形而上学世界观出发, At present, there are basically two opinions on the discussion of the second law of thermodynamics. The former opinion holds that the Clausius or Kelvin theory of the second law of thermodynamics itself contains the idea that the movement should be gradually eliminated and is fundamentally against the philosophy of dialectical materialism Principle, will inevitably lead to “heat silence”; criticism “heat silence” must start from the second law of thermodynamics itself, otherwise you can not hit the key. The latter opinion holds that “hot silence” is a reactionary fallacy, but the second law of thermodynamics itself is not wrong, wrong is wrong in the Crowe Cuth and others starting from the bourgeois idealist metaphysical world outlook,