言论,是报纸的旗帜,历来为报人所看重。然而对于许多读者来说,提到言论,似乎就是耳提面命“教训人”和纸上谈兵“教育人”的代名词,不看也罢。其实这并不怪读者,翻开报纸就不难发现,有的言论是对政策法规加以呆板皮相的释读,有的言论是对国内外大事进行“空对空”式的鼓噪,有的是对一些新名词新概念不着边际的炒作,有的是拿鸡毛蒜皮的琐事给定期的栏目凑数……从大尺度范围考察,目前除少部分权威性报纸外,言论表现出的生硬、浮躁甚至俗气,应该是不争的事实。然而,难道只有无奈吗?仅就晚报言论而言,能否也能像晚报一样走进家庭、融入万家灯火?即便“登堂入室”了,能否做到“点点滴滴上心头”?这里从《扬子晚报》的三组作品来谈谈晚报的言论特色。 Speech, is the banner of the newspaper, has always been valued by the newspaper people. However, for many readers, the reference to speech seems to be a synonym for “teaching people” and “educating people” on paper, not to mention it. In fact, this is not to blame the readers. It is not hard to find the newspapers opened. Some of them are interpretations of the rigid rules and regulations of the policies and regulations. Some of the remarks are an “air-to-air” Term new concept is not boundless speculation, some trivial to take trivial to give a chore a few columns ... ... from a large-scale investigation, with the exception of a few authoritative newspapers, the statement showed stiff, impetuous and even cheesy, it should be an indisputable fact . However, only helpless? Only on the evening newspaper remarks, the same can be the same as the evening went into the family, into the Wandeng lights? Even if “demeanor”, can “bit by bit”? From here “Evening Evening,” the three groups of works to talk about the evening’s remarks features.