论文部分内容阅读
1997年4月4日,清明时节,《人民日报》华东版于显著位置发表一条重要信息:千字杂文讼案历时三年见分晓江苏高院撤销一二审判决判作者袁成兰不构成侵权当天,南京地区读者见报后,纷纷奔走相告,电话传诵。了解这桩官司由来,并为女作家袁成兰鸣不平的人们莫不拍手称快。笔者作为杂文界的一员,深知这个胜
On April 4, 1997, during the Ching Ming Festival, the East China Edition of the “People’s Daily” published an important piece of information in a prominent position: the case of a thousand-character essay saw a trifling matter in three years. Jiangsu High People’s Court reversed the judgment of the first and second trial Yuan Chenglan did not constitute the infringer’s day, After reading the newspaper readers in Nanjing, have rushed to tell, telephone chanting. Understand the origin of the lawsuit, and for the woman writer Yuan Chenglan people clamoring each other. I as a member of the essay community, well aware of this victory