休谟提出如何从“是”推出“应该”的问题。盛庆王来教授借助于决策论的描述—规范的双重性和社会统计平均概念给出一个功利主义的解决方案。张华夏教授对此提出质疑。笔者借助于重复博弈模型对此方案作了进一步的评价 ,并指出休谟问题以新的形式依然存在 ,即 :已经传递到追求个人长远利益上的道德的应然性能否进一步传递到追求个人眼前利益上来 ?如果能 ,如何说明 ?在笔者看来 ,休谟问题是不可能完全解决的 Hume proposed how to launch “should” from “yes”. Prof. Sheng Qing Wang Lai gave a utilitarian solution by means of the description of decision theory - the duality of norms and the average concept of social statistics. Professor Zhang Huaxia questioned this. I use the repeated game model to further evaluate the program, and pointed out that the Hume problem still exists in a new form, namely: has been passed to the long-term interests of individuals seeking to further pass on to the pursuit of personal interests of the immediate interests If so, how to explain? In my opinion, the Hume problem can not be completely solved