调查核实证据的权力是法官审判权的重要体现。如果调查是对证据的搜集,尚可以接受;但若以核实证据的真伪为目的的调查,则有僭越之嫌。民事诉讼涉及的主要是当事人的个人权利,是一种私诉,因此,法官在对民事诉讼中证据的调查核实上应拥有最少的权力,更多的处于中立的地位。从世界趋势来看,为保证公正与效率的统一,核实证据在民事诉讼中应加以明确的限定。 The power of investigation and verification of evidence is an important manifestation of the judge’s jurisdiction. If the investigation is a gathering of evidence, it is still acceptable. However, if the investigation for the purpose of verifying the authenticity of the evidence is too suspicious Therefore, the judge should have the least power in investigating and verifying the evidence in civil litigation, and more in a neutral position. From a global perspective, in order to ensure the unity of fairness and efficiency, verification of evidence should be clearly defined in civil litigation.