论文部分内容阅读
分地区叙述了广东从新石器时代中期到先秦以前农业考古的状况。认为距今6500年左右广东才有比较明显的原始稻作的迹象。在粤北地区,距今4500年的石峡文化,是岭南原始稻作的标志性事件。但是石峡文化稻作的辉煌没有延续到石峡中层反而有退化迹象,石峡上层亦如此。石峡稻作的发展程度和扩散有待新的考古发现来论证。在粤西,杏花河流域的原始稻作也有发展的迹象,但是如将粤西的原始稻作作为文化来考察,在考古上的证据尚显薄弱。在粤中,早期出现的咸头岭遗址等沙丘遗址,是一种以采捕为主,兼有农业的类型,但由于季节性强而原始农业并未能发展起来,大部分沙丘、贝丘遗址都是以采捕渔猎为主的。西樵山文化是大型石器制作场,但是它的遗址类型主要是以采集捕猎业,兼农业的类型。在粤中广泛分布的贝丘遗址,只有河岸型贝丘遗址稍有农业的内涵,海岸型、河口型贝丘遗址则缺乏原始农业。在进入青铜时代的河宕遗址、村头遗址,尽管有大型居住遗址,但还是以渔猎捕猎为主,原始农业占的比例不大,因此它们缺乏持续发展的后劲。粤东、粤西南的考古文化中,较之上述地区原始农业的内涵更为薄弱。通过对新石器时代中期到先秦时代的考古地域的分析,认为锄耕农业在这一时期并未能充分发展起来,原始农业并未能为岭南早期文明的起源提供充足的剩余物。
The sub-regions narrated the status of agricultural archeology in Guangdong from the mid-Neolithic period to the pre-Qin period. It is believed that there are obvious indications of primitive rice in Guangdong about 6500 years ago. In northern Guangdong, the Shekialu culture dating back 4500 years is a landmark event in the original rice farming in Lingnan. However, the splendor of Shixia culture rice did not extend to the middle of Shixia but showed signs of degradation. The development and spread of Shixia rice crop needs to be proved by the new archeological findings. In the west of Guangdong, there are indications of the development of the original paddy in the Heng Fa Chuen River Valley. However, if we look at the original paddy in western Guangdong as a culture, the evidence in archeology is still weak. In Guangdong, the dune site of the early Xiantouling Site was a predominantly agricultural type, but due to its seasonal nature, the primitive agriculture failed to develop. Most of the dunes, Ruins are mainly fishing and hunting. Xiqiao Mountain Culture is a large-scale stone production site, but its site type is mainly based on the collection of hunting and agriculture types. The widespread shellfish site in Guangdong is only a little agricultural connotation of the riparian shellfish site. Coastal and estuarine shellfish sites lack primary agriculture. Entering the bronze age of the river dang ruins, the site of the village head, despite the existence of large-scale dwelling sites, is dominated by fishing and hunting and primitive agriculture accounts for a small proportion of the sites. Therefore, they lacks the stamina for sustained development. In eastern Guangdong and southwestern Guangdong, the archaeological culture is weaker than the connotation of primitive agriculture in these areas. Through the analysis of archeological areas from the Neolithic Age to the pre-Qin era, it was considered that hoeing agriculture was not fully developed during this period. The primitive agriculture did not provide sufficient residue for the origins of early Lingnan civilization.