不久前的一次活动中,一位北大教授讲起他访问韩国和日本的不愉快经历。据他说,在韩国的一次学术会议上,一位韩国学者公然提出儒家学说起源于韩国,更通过“严密”的考证,得出“孔子是韩国人”的结论,并且索性一并将“老子”、“屈原”也收入韩国的人才库,说这些先贤均出生于韩国。这种奇谈在中国人听来就是笑话,但人家那里可是正儿八经的学术议题。看到这位北大教授如此痛心疾首地呼吁要保卫中华传统文化,我当时一笑,说了几句不算气话的气话。我说,既然我们自己不拿这些传统当宝贝,称孔子为孔老二,儒家学说是封建迷信,人家不嫌弃,反当成圣物供起来,我看没什么不好。只能怪我们自己 In a recent event, a Peking University professor talked about his unpleasant experience of visiting South Korea and Japan. According to him, at a South Korean academic conference, a South Korean scholar flagrantly put forward that Confucianism originated in South Korea and that “Confucius is a Korean” came to the conclusion that “Confucianism is Korean” And “Lao Tzu”, “Qu Yuan” also income in South Korea’s talent pool, said these sages were born in South Korea. This odd talk sounds like a joke to the Chinese people, but others are just academic subjects that are being treated. I saw this Peking University professor so bitterly urged to defend the Chinese traditional culture, I was a smile, said a few words of non-existent words. I said that since we ourselves do not take these traditions as babes and call Confucius the second eldest son, Confucianism is a feudal superstition, people do not mind being ashamed to be antiquities, and I think nothing is wrong. Can only blame ourselves