论文部分内容阅读
朝鲜语中只有对擦音,以松、紧为对立特征,分别记为/s/和/s*/。汉语普通话中的擦音虽然很丰富,但同部位的只有一个清擦音/s/。本文采取语音实验手段对朝汉两种语言中的齿龈擦音进行对比分析。考察的内容包括双音节前字、后字音首位置擦音的时长、中心频率和后接元音的基频等。考察后发现,朝鲜语松音/s/的性质很不稳定,在不同的语音环境有不同的表现,而紧音/s*/和汉语的/s/在不同位置的时长、强频区和后接元音基频等方面的表现则比较稳定。整体比较,汉语齿龈擦音/s/的语音表现更接近朝鲜语的紧音/s*/。
Korean only rubbing sound, loose, tight as the opposite characteristics, respectively, recorded as / s / and / s * /. Although the fricatives in Chinese Mandarin are very rich, there is only one rubbing sound / s / in the same place. In this paper, the voice experiment means to compare the two kinds of language in the Korean and Chinese language scrub sound. The contents of the study include the duration of the first syllable words, the initial position of the second words, the center frequency and the fundamental frequency of the following vowels. After investigation, it was found that the nature of Korean Loose Sings / s / is very unstable and has different performances in different voice environments. However, the tightness / s * / and the Chinese / s / length of time in different locations, Followed by the vowel fundamental frequency and other aspects of the performance is relatively stable. As a whole, the speech performance of Chinese hygienic / s / is closer to the compact voice / s * / of Korean.