论文部分内容阅读
1992年春在广西亚热带作物研究所布置进行的 7年芒果品比试验结果 :试验树于 1995年投产 ,投产后连续 3年平均 6 6 7m2 产量较高是桂热芒 2 82号为10 6 4 .0 1公斤 ,其次是紫花芒 (对照 ) 831.72公斤 ,桂热芒 12 0号 745 .5 9公斤 ,最低是桂热芒 2 76号 10 2 .6 6公斤。经生物统计结果 ,桂热芒 2 82号产量显著高于紫花芒 (对照 )和桂热芒 12 0号 ,极显著高于其余 4个参试品种 (系 ) ,桂热芒 12 0号与紫花芒 (对照 )差异不显著 ;圣心 ( Sensation)和桂热芒 2 78号、桂热芒 2 6 5号、桂热芒 2 76号 3个品系分别显著和极显著低于紫花芒 (对照 )。桂热芒 12 0号在品质、可食率、采前落果等方面优于紫花芒 (对照 ) ,而皮色、丰产性、稳产性、栽培性状等则与对照近似 ,可进行区域性和生产性试验。圣心 ( Sensation)、桂热芒 2 78号和桂热芒 2 76号品质中等 ,一般不宜发展种植。较早熟的桂热芒 2 6 5号和鲜食味略淡但较高产的桂热芒 2 82号可保留进一步观察
In the spring of 1992, the results of 7-year mangle ratio test conducted in Guangxi Subtropical Crop Research Institute were as follows: The test tree was put into operation in 1995 and the average output of 6 6 7 m 2 after 3 years of operation was higher than that of Gui Wen Mian 2 82 106. 0 1 kg, followed by 831.72 kg of purple mandarin (control), 745.59 kg of Gui Wen Mang 12 0, and 10 2 .6 6 kg of Guisenmeng 2 76 at a minimum. According to the biometric results, the yield of Guizameng 2 82 was significantly higher than that of the purple flowers (Control) and Guizinteng 12 0, which was significantly higher than the other 4 cultivars (lines) There was no significant difference between the two groups (Sensation and Guizengmian 2 78, Guizengmian 2 65, Guizinteng 2 76) . Guizinteng 12 0 was superior to Amaranthus retroflexus (control) in terms of quality, edible rate, fruit drop before harvesting, etc., while skin color, high yield, stable yield, and cultivated characters were similar to the control and could be used for regionalization and production Sexual test. Sensation, Guisenmai No. 2 78 and Guizintensi No. 2 76 are of medium quality and generally should not be grown. The older Gui Wen Mian No. 265 and the slightly lighter but higher-yield Gui Wen Mian No. 822 could be preserved for further observation