论文部分内容阅读
探讨审稿者年龄对审稿质量是否有影响。对 64期中华系列杂志已刊发论文的 40 60份审稿意见 ,按A组 (审稿者3 5～ 49岁 )和B组 (5 0岁以上 ) 2组分别进行分类整理。结果为不同年龄组对审稿侧重点不完全相同 :在设计方法及提出修改意见方面 ,A组提出的建议较B组少 ,而在对统计学方法提出修改建议及对参考文献进行审核方面 ,A组提出的建议较B组多。提示应该大胆启用年轻的审稿专家 ,从而可以使审稿队伍趋于年轻化。
Discuss whether the reviewer’s age has an impact on the quality of reviewers. A review of 40 60 reviewers who published papers in 64 China series journals was organized by group A (reviewers 35-59) and group B (over 50) respectively. The results for different age groups on the reviewers focus is not exactly the same: in the design methods and put forward suggestions for amendment, A group made fewer recommendations than the B group, but in the statistical methods to make suggestions for changes and review of references, Group A made more recommendations than Group B. It is suggested that the young reviewer should be boldly employed so that the reviewer team can be rejuvenated.