论文部分内容阅读
文如其人,刊亦如其人(主编),我是《北京广播学院学报》副主编,领导信任,实际上主持工作,《学报》也具有新鲜和博通的特点。 学术刊物是科研成果的发表园地。科学研究就其本质来说是对未知领域的探索,它的最高价值应当是对未来的科学预测,因此,学术刊物用稿标准当是“新”字打头,新观点,新视角,新观念,新思路以至于新材料。这种指导思想我们始终很明确,抓住不放,着力加以突出,在版面上从不吝啬。1987年珠江经济广播电台在我国广播界率先大规模改革,从内容到形式按照听众的需要办广播,取得了惊人的成绩。我当时主编《新闻广播电视研究》,我在该刊1988年第1期上用了三分之一的版面集中发表了关于这家电台改革的研究稿件(当时广东省以外的刊物还没有研究这家电台改革),在社会上获得好评。1992年年初北京地区出现了一股电视纪录片纪实风格的研究热潮,这种研究是对前一两年纪录片过分强调灌输和教育的反弹,开头我们发表了十来篇稿件全面反映了研究成果。但是这些研究往往给人一种印象,似乎只有跟拍和同期声才可以真实地纪录生活,才是纪录片的唯一正途。到了3月份,有的研究者提出纪实不是真实的观点,认为纪实和表现都只是一种美学手法,我们立即约了这篇稿件,发表后引起广泛关注,这篇稿件的发表把纪录片的?
As the man of his own, the journal is also like his (chief editor), and I am the associate editor of the journal of Beijing Broadcasting Institute. She leads the trust and actually runs the work. The Journal also has the characteristics of freshness and Broadcom. Academic publications is the publication of scientific research. Scientific research, by its very nature, is an exploration of the unknown field. Its highest value should be a scientific prediction of the future. Therefore, the standard of academic journals should start with “new” characters, new ideas, new perspectives, new concepts, New ideas that new materials. This guiding principle we have always been very clear, seize hold, focus on highlighting, never stingy on the layout. In 1987, Pearl River Economic Broadcasting Station took the lead in large-scale reform in the broadcasting industry in our country and made amazing achievements from content to form according to the needs of the audience. I was the chief editor of “News Broadcasting and Television Studies” at the time. I wrote a manuscript about the radio reform in one third of the issue in the first issue of the journal in 1988 (at a time when publications outside Guangdong Province had not been studied yet Radio station reform), in the community received praise. In early 1992, there was a research boom in the documentary style of television documentary in Beijing. This research was a rebound on the excessive emphasis on indoctrination and education in the previous one or two documentaries. At the beginning, we published over ten articles and fully reflected the research results. However, these studies often give the impression that it seems that the only correct way to document a documentary is to document the true life of a documentary. By March, some researchers proposed that documentary truth is not a true one. They think that both documentary and performance are just aesthetic approaches. We immediately agreed on this manuscript and aroused widespread concern after it was published. The publication of this manuscript documentary?