本文从介绍传闻证据的概念(在审判或讯问时,作证的证人以外的人所表达或做出的被作为证据提出,以证实其所包含的事实是否真实的,一种口头或书面的意思表示或有意无意地带有某种意思表示的非语言行为)入手,引出传闻证据排除规则的概念(在诉讼或听证外形成的口头或是书面的证据都不具有可采性),接着分析了排除规则的法理依据。当然,本文对于传闻证据排除规则的例外情形及其法理基础也进行了研究。因为在许多情况下,案件最有力的证据可能正是那些传闻证据,如果不对其例外情况也进行一定分析的话,许多案件可能就不能圆满解决,实体正义也无法实现。最后,从我国刑事诉讼方面着手,通过对刑事诉讼方面传闻证据排除规则的研究,表明应确立传闻证据排除规则,并对我国的司法实践提出了建议。 This article begins with an introduction to the concept of hearsay (at the trial or interrogation, what is expressed or made by a person other than the witness who testified at the trial or interrogation as evidence to substantiate whether the facts contained therein are true or not, either verbally or in writing Or intentional or unintentional nonverbal behavior with some kind of meaning) leads to the notion of hearsay exclusionary rule (neither verbal nor written evidence outside the lawsuit or hearing is admissible), and then analyzes the exclusionary rules The legal basis. Of course, this article also does research on the exception of hearsay rule and its jurisprudence. Because in many cases the strongest evidence in the case may be precisely those hearsay evidence, many cases may not be satisfactorily resolved without the proper analysis of their exceptions, and substantive justice will not be achieved. Finally, starting from the criminal procedure in our country, through the research on the rule of hearsay exclusion in criminal procedure, it shows that we should establish the rule of hearsay exclusion and put forward the suggestion to our judicial practice.