从20世纪80年代至今,我国的对策评价经历了孕育萌芽、逐步成长和系统发展三个阶段。以中国社会科学院、国家行政学院和国务院发展研究中心等为代表的中国智库组织,承担了许多对策评价工作。通过观察国内对策评价的发展历程,可以看出其中的三个转变:评价方法从定性评价向定量评价转变、对策成果奖励制度从松散到系统的转变、由自我评价向外部委托评价转变。同时,也存在着对对策评价的重要性认识不足、实践经验不足,对策评价方法缺乏科学的依据,对策评价机构缺乏统一的评价尺度,对策评价缺乏畅通的反馈渠道,评价主体偏向以政府主导、存在“唯批示论”误区,对策评价成果转化推动力不足等问题。因此,要进一步加强对策评价的制度化建设、程序化建设、专业化建设、科学化建设、标准化建设,这样才能保证对策评价结果的客观性、准确性、合理性,为政府筛选出优质的对策成果。 From the 1980s till the present, the evaluation of our country’s countermeasures has undergone three stages of sprouting, gradual growth and systematic development. The Chinese think tank organization represented by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the State Administration Institute and the State Council Development Research Center undertakes many measures evaluation. By observing the course of the development of domestic countermeasures, we can find out three of them: the change of evaluation method from qualitative evaluation to quantitative evaluation, the change of countermeasure achievement reward system from looseness to systematic transformation from self-evaluation to external evaluation. At the same time, there is also lack of understanding of the importance of countermeasure evaluation, lack of practical experience and lack of a scientific basis for evaluation of countermeasures. There is a lack of a uniform evaluation scale for countermeasures and evaluation agencies, and a lack of smooth feedback channels for countermeasures. Evaluation subjects tend to be dominated by the government, There are some problems such as the “only criticism theory” misunderstanding and the lack of impetus for the transformation of countermeasures and evaluation results. Therefore, it is necessary to further strengthen the systematic construction, procedural construction, specialization construction, scientific construction and standardization construction of countermeasures evaluation, so as to ensure the objectivity, accuracy and rationality of the evaluation results of the countermeasures so as to screen out good measures for the government Results.