论文部分内容阅读
我国法理学目前没有形成明显的流派。在个别问题上的观点独特与差异不一定就属于流派分野。流派是以“争鸣”为前提,没有“争鸣”就不可能形成流派。历来学术流派都是在经历了相当长时间的学术争鸣、确定了理论的逻辑基点、形成了相对稳定的理论范畴、运用了独到的学术研究方法、沉淀了丰富的学术思想之后,才在学术上被公认的。就今日中国法理学研究局面而言,流派的分野还不明显。然而,没有流派不等于没有必要谈流派。它不影响我们今天以科学、认真的态度来讨论法理学流派问题。
At present, there is no obvious school of jurisprudence in our country. The uniqueness and difference of views on individual issues do not necessarily belong to the genre division. Genres are based on “contention” as the premise, without “contention” it is impossible to form a genre. Historically, academic schools have undergone academic arguments for quite a long time, determined the logical starting point of the theory, formed a relatively stable theoretical category, used unique academic research methods, and precipitated a wealth of academic ideas before they were academically Be recognized. As far as the situation of jurisprudence research in China is concerned, the division of schools is not obvious. However, no genre does not mean there is no need to talk about genres. It does not affect our discussion of jurisprudence schools in a scientific and serious manner today.