论文部分内容阅读
实践表明,案例中提到的临床知情决策机制的运行取得了很好的效果,一是在一对一咨询决策过程中,患者首先感受到了重视和尊重,对自身的病情得到相对充分的了解;二是在接受咨询过程中,患者对该疾病的治疗方案、预期结果、费用等事项得到了充分的认识,满足了知情权的需要;三是在参与决策的过程中,满足了其参与权的需要,既然是自身选择的结果,也就更能接受可能不利的后果。案例中的医院,如
Practice shows that the operation of clinical informed decision-making mechanism mentioned in the case has achieved good results. First, in the process of one-on-one consultation and decision-making, patients first feel the importance and respect and get a relatively adequate understanding of their own condition. Second, during the process of consultation, the patients were fully aware of the treatment plan, expected result and cost of the disease, meeting the needs of the right to information. Third, in the process of participating in decision-making, they met their right of participation Need, since it is the result of their own choice, also more acceptable to the possible adverse consequences. Hospitals in the case, for example