论文部分内容阅读
多年来,许多工厂设备维修推行修理周期结构和修理复杂系数为主要依据的计划预修制度,由于经济性较差,已被越来越多的单位所修正。有的单位逐步演变到按需修理,有的单位甚至回到事后修理,修理体制极其混乱。另一方面,设备大修费用全由企业负担,而设备中修(或项修)和日常维护费用又都打入车间成本,因此,车间就争报大修,不报中修,避免小修,致使有的设备修理过剩,而许多该修的设备却得不到修理,形成了一种畸形的设备维修计划。
Over the years, many prefabricated repair systems that rely on repair cycle structures and repair complexity factors for many plant equipment repairs have been revised by more and more units due to poor economic performance. Some units gradually evolved to on-demand repairs. Some units even went back for repairs afterwards. The repair system was extremely chaotic. On the other hand, equipment overhaul costs are borne entirely by the company, and equipment repairs (or repairs) and routine maintenance costs are all incurred in the cost of the workshop. Therefore, the workshop is overhauled, not reported to the repairs, and minor repairs are avoided. The equipment was overhauled and many of the repaired equipment were not repaired, creating a deformed equipment maintenance program.