论文部分内容阅读
梁启超“新史学”以后,学界对中国通史书写的探索,为抗战时期中国通史的书写提供了重要学术资源;而唯物史观在中国的传播及其特点,则影响了抗战时期中国马克思主义史家的通史书写。抗战时期,中国马克思主义史家中国通史书写的重要特点和价值,是以唯物史观为指导,构建了中国马克思主义史学的通史体系;而与非马克思主义史家相比,他们在史学的社会科学化取向、对考古学和史料考订的重视、中外比较视野等方面,存在很多相似之处。同时,这一时期出版的一些非马克思主义史家较有代表性的通史著述中,也体现出了明显的唯物史观的影响。这些特点,既体现出抗战时期中国史学界在学术取向上的某种趋同现象,同时也反映了唯物史观的影响力和中国马克思主义史学的发展。
After Liang Qichao ’s “New History ”, the exploration of general history in China by the academic circles provided important academic resources for the writing of general history in China during the Anti-Japanese War. The spread and characteristics of historical materialism in China influenced the Chinese Marxism during the War of Resistance Against Japan Historian’s history writing. In the period of the War of Resistance Against Japan, the important characteristic and value of Chinese history writing by Chinese Marxist historians are based on the historical materialism and the general history system of Chinese Marxist historiography. Compared with non-Marxist historians, Orientation, archeology and historical data, the comparison of Chinese and foreign perspectives, there are many similarities. At the same time, some representative non-Marxist historians published during this period also reflected the obvious impact of historical materialism. These characteristics reflect not only some convergence of academic historiography in the period of the War of Resistance Against Japan but also the influence of historical materialism and the development of Chinese Marxist historiography.