论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较皮下埋植剂(Implanon)和宫内节育器(GCu300)在人流术后的避孕效果及续用率。方法:2012年12月至2014年12月医院对停经8周内,要求终止妊娠且同时需避孕的妇女,在自愿选择避孕方式的原则上,在人工流产术后,一组(150例)即时植入Implanon,另一组(150例)即时放置含铜宫腔形宫内节育器GCu300,术后定期随访2年,观察和比较两组妇女妊娠率、脱落率及术后2年不良反应发生情况。结果:植入Implanon组妊娠率、脱落率与放置GCu300组无统计学差异,其副反应发生率低于放置GCu300组。结论:人工流产术即时植入皮下埋植剂和放置宫内节育器一样,具有安全性高,避孕效果可靠等优点,适用于临床应用。
OBJECTIVE: To compare contraceptive effectiveness and follow-up rate of implanon and intrauterine device (GCu300) after abortion. METHODS: From December 2012 to December 2014, in a group of women (150 cases) immediately after an abortion, in the principle of voluntary choice of contraception, women who requested termination of pregnancy and required contraception within 8 weeks after menopause were hospitalized. Implantation of Implanon, the other group (150 cases) immediately placed intrauterine copper-containing intrauterine device GCu300, regular follow-up of 2 years after operation, observe and compare the pregnancy rate, abortion rate and 2 years after the occurrence of adverse reactions in both groups Happening. Results: Implantation Implanon group pregnancy rate, exfoliation rate and place GCu300 no significant difference, the incidence of side effects was lower than placed GCu300 group. Conclusions: Implantation of artificial abortion implantation implants, like implantable IUDs, has the advantages of high safety and reliable contraception and is suitable for clinical application.