论文部分内容阅读
2016年5月,《法律与生活》杂志上刊登了上海某大学生陈桦(化名)向警方交代了他按“北京警方”要求实施的离奇抢夺案。那么,陈桦的行为到底有罪乎?无罪乎?通过电话遥控指挥陈桦对许女士实施抢夺的犯罪嫌疑人目前尚未被抓获,许女士损失的2万元怎么办?她有没有权利要求陈桦赔偿?解读1陈桦的行为不成立刑事犯罪抢夺罪,是指以非法占有为目的,当场直接夺取他人紧密占有的数额较大公私财物的行为,它是夺物犯、数额犯和目的犯的有机统一,即三个方面的要件必须同时具备。这是罪刑法定原则的要求。
In May 2016, Chen Hua (a pseudonym) from a university student in Shanghai was published in Law and Life magazine and confessed to the police about the bizarre robbery he had requested by Beijing Police. So, Chen Hua’s behavior in the end guilty? Innocent? Directed by telephone remote control Chen Hua on the suspects Xu capture the suspect has not yet been arrested, Ms. Xu lost 20,000 yuan how to do? She has no right to request Chen Interpretation 1 Chen Hua’s behavior does not establish a crime of criminal snatch crime, refers to the illegal possession for the purpose of the direct capture of others on the larger possession of large amounts of public and private property acts, it is robbery, the amount of committing and purpose committed Organic unity, that is, the three elements must be at the same time. This is the legal principle of crime and punishment requirements.