论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较两种途径子宫切除手术的临床效果。方法:我院近3 a接受两种途径子宫切除手术的病例共228例,其中,传统式子宫切除术176例;改良式子宫切除术52例,比较两组的疾病种类、手术时间、术中出血量、术中发现有否盆腔粘连、术后发热天数及使用抗生素时间、术后贫血情况、住院时间及医疗费用等。结果:比较各指标的差异。结论:全子宫切除术改良式手术优于传统式手术。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of hysterectomy in two ways. Methods: A total of 228 cases of hysterectomy were accepted in our hospital in the past 3 years. There were 176 cases of traditional hysterectomy and 52 cases of modified hysterectomy. The types of diseases, operation time, Bleeding, intraoperative findings of pelvic adhesions, postoperative fever days and the use of antibiotics, postoperative anemia, length of stay and medical costs. Results: Compare the difference of each index. Conclusion: Hysterectomy is better than traditional surgery.