刘浦江先生《正视陈寅恪》文(见《读书》二○○四年二期),不为大师讳,于陈氏持“保守”“遗民”说,有据而不失公正。然引“依稀廿载忆光宣,犹是开元全盛年”诗句(句见《王观堂先生挽词》),断言“光、宣的腐败,是连清人也不否认的。而陈寅恪居然把光、宣比做开元盛世”;则史学大 Mr. Liu Pujiang “Face Chen Yin Ke” (see “Reading” 2004 two), not for the master taboo, in Chen’s “conservative” “descendants” said, there is evidence without losing justice. However, cited “vaguely remembered Guangxuan, is still the Kaiyuan Prosperous Year” verse (see “Mr. Wang Guantang draw the word”), asserted that “light, declared corruption, is not even to deny the Lianghuai Chen Yin Ke actually light, Xuan than Kaiyuan prosperity ”; then the history of large