论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对李昌麒教授关于经济法的“需要干预说”进行分析,认为该说明显带有移植资本主义国家关于经济法的“干预说”的色彩,且“需要”一词不适于定义。本文力图从国情、国体、经济、政治等方面揭示经济法应反映国家对宏观、社会及市场经济问题的直接控制和间接调节的本旨,从而提出经济法“调-控说”,并试以之为基石构筑经济法学和法律体系。
Based on the analysis of Professor Li Changqi’s “Necessary Intervention Theory” on Economic Law, this article argues that the explanation is obviously accompanied by the “intervention” of the capitalist countries on economic law, and the term “need” is not suitable for definition. This article attempts to reveal from the national conditions, state, economy, politics and other aspects that economic law should reflect the direct and indirect regulation of the macroeconomic, social and market economy by the state, so as to put forward the “regulation and control theory” of economic law and try it out As the cornerstone of economic law and legal system.