论文部分内容阅读
《历史教学》2016年第7期发表了汪瀛老师的文章《美国1787年宪法评析是与非》(以下简称汪文),文章旁征博引,思考深入,对世界上第一部资产阶级成文宪法作了理性、冷静的分析,发人之所未发,打破了为追捧而追捧的价值迷信,为历史教学增添了独立思考的魅力。然而,就汪老师“让美国1787年宪法走下神坛”的几点理由,笔者还是有些不同意见,本着历史求真和求实的精神,向方家求正。一、“首在化解当时美国所面临的经济与政
In the 7th issue of History Teaching, published in the 7th issue of Wang Ying’s article “The American Constitution of 1787 is a Commentary on Right and Wrong” (hereinafter referred to as Wang Wen). The article was written by others and was deeply thought. It was written for the first written constitution of the bourgeoisie in the world. A rational, calm analysis, and the failure to send people, broke the value superstition pursued for sought after, and added the charm of independent thinking to history teaching. However, the author still had some disagreements with respect to Wang’s arguments of ”letting the United States adopt the 1787 constitution“. In the spirit of seeking truth from truth and seeking truth from facts, we must seek truth from Fang. First, ”first to resolve the economy and politics that the United States faced at the time.