司法案件素来是社会热点。近来各地多起酒后驾车撞人案件的判决量刑,被一并置于舆论聚光灯下,成为“热点案例”。 “热点案例”处于舆论中心,社会关注度高。其审判结果若与舆论民意发生偏离,则纷扰立现:有质疑审判公正、法律正义者;有j比判舆论审判危及法律尊严、民众应提高法治素养者。二者泾渭分明。有论者进而认为,司法审判的法律效果与社会效果殊难统一。 Judicial cases have always been social hot spots. Recently, many cases of drunk driving were sentenced to death and sentenced to be put together under the spotlight of public opinion to become a “hot case”. “Hot case ” is in the center of public opinion, social attention is high. If the outcome of the trial deviates from the opinion and opinion of the public, there will be disturbances: there are those who have justly questioned the fairness and justice of the trial; those who judge the public opinions endanger the dignity of the law and the public should raise their awareness of the rule of law. The two are distinct. Someone argues that the legal effect and social effect of judicial trial are extremely difficult to unify.