论文部分内容阅读
拜读了贵刊一九九一年第三期上所载《浅议补阳还五汤应属补气剂》后,很佩服作者研读精细,发微探幽的精神,但笔者对此论点不敢苟同,现略陈管见,并予商榷。首先这个问题涉及到方剂的分类问题,方剂的分类是一个不断演化变迁的过程。历代医家有以病名分类的,有以脏腑分类的,有以证侯分类的,有以功效分类的,其中以方剂功效分类的方法因比较适合临床,故近代运用较多。也是中医院校第四、五版《方剂学》教材的分类方法.
After reading the “A Brief Discussion on Bu Yang Huan Wu Decoction” in the third issue of 1991, the author was impressed by the author’s ability to study fine and explore the spirit, but the author was afraid of this argument. In the same way, I would like to talk to you and discuss with you. First of all, this issue involves the classification of prescriptions. The classification of prescriptions is a process of constant evolution. Historical physicians are classified by disease names, classified by organs, classified by syndromes, and classified by efficacy. Among them, the method of classification of prescription efficacy is more suitable for clinics, so modern methods are used more often. It is also the fourth and fifth edition of Chinese medicine colleges “Fundamentals” teaching material classification method.