论文部分内容阅读
中学教材《鸿门宴》选自《史记·项羽本纪》。选文之叙事,从沛公左司马曹无伤与项羽暗通款曲开始。对照《项羽本纪》,选文前尚有关涉“鸿门宴”背景的少许文字: 《楚军》行略定秦地,函谷关有兵守关,不得入。又闻沛公已破咸阳,项羽大怒,使当阳君等击关,项羽遂入,至于戏西。(下称“引文”) 引文清楚地记载,鸿门宴前,刘邦派兵“守关”、项羽率军“击关”,双方曾有一场激烈的军事冲突。笔者认为,割断“函关之战”和“鸿门之宴”的内在联系,将引文一刀砍掉,既模糊了故事发生的背景,也掐断了作者叙事的脉络。 应当看到,引文是交待刘邦鸿门“谢罪”原因的重要笔墨。
The high school textbook “The Banquet of the Banquet” is selected from the “Historical Record of Xiang Yu”. The narrative of the essay began with Pei Gong Zuo Sima Cao without injuries and Xiang Yu’s covert song. In contrast to Xiang Yu’s book, there are a few texts related to the background of the Banquet before the selection of the text: “The Chu Army” has decided to set up the Qin Dynasty, and the Hangu Pass has guarded the troops and is not allowed to enter. He also heard that Pei Gong had broken Xianyang, and Xiang Yu was furious. When Dang Yangjun and others attacked Guan Yu, Xiang Yu broke in. As for the play west. (Hereinafter referred to as “quotation”) The citation clearly stated that prior to the Banquet, Liu Bang sent troops to “guard the gate” and Xiang Yu led the army to “hit the gate”. Both parties had a fierce military conflict. The author believes that cutting off the internal relations between the “War of Letters” and the “Feast of Banqueting” cuts the citations by one knife. This not only blurs the background of the story, but also cuts off the context of the author’s narrative. It should be noted that the citations are an important brush to explain why Liu Banghong has “apologized.”