人民监督员制度试行以来,其选任在现有实践中存在多种选任模式,有同级人大选任的、有检察院自己选任的,有政法委选任的等等。学者们对此也是仁者见仁、智者见智。伴随人民监督员制度法制化建设的步伐日益加快,从法制的视角审视,人民监督员的选任应定位为由同级人大选任最为科学合理,人大选任人民监督员具有法理基础上的正当性、法律依据上的合法性。 Since the implementation of the system of people’s monitors, there have been a variety of modes of appointment in the existing practice. There are candidates for election by the people’s congresses at the same level, elected by the procuratorate themselves, and elected by the commissions of political science and law. Scholars also regard benevolence as kind-hearted, wise men see wisdom. With the progress of the legal system construction of the people supervisor system being accelerated day by day, from the viewpoint of the legal system, the election of the people’s supervisors should be positioned as the most scientific and reasonable election by the people’s congress at the same level. The people’s procuratorial people’s supervisors have the legitimacy based on jurisprudence and the law Basis on the legitimacy.