论文部分内容阅读
基于经济利益抑或名誉利益的考量,世界各地的仲裁机构均热衷于“最受欢迎国际商事仲裁地”之角逐,仲裁机构外设和扩张的脚步日益加快。由于中国法律框架下仲裁裁决国籍的认定标准与通行的“领土标准”存在张力,增加了此情形下仲裁裁决承认与执行的不确定性。本文试从国外仲裁机构入境仲裁与国内仲裁委员会外设两种情形分别讨论相应的仲裁裁决的国籍以及司法监督的界限。
Based on economic considerations or reputational interests, arbitration agencies around the world are keen on the race to “the most popular international commercial arbitration venue,” and the pace of arbitration agency peripherals and expansion is accelerating. Due to the existence of tension in the nationality standard of arbitral awards and the prevailing “territorial standards” under the legal framework of China, the uncertainty of the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under such circumstances is increased. This article tries to discuss the nationality of the corresponding arbitral awards and the boundaries of judicial supervision from the arbitration agencies’ entry arbitration and the domestic arbitration committee’s peripherals respectively.