论文部分内容阅读
《商标法》赋予注册商标在一定范围内具有排他性,但特殊情况下商标的共存却又必不可少。本文将结合“鸭王及图”商标异议复审案并依据《商标法》的有关规定进行阐述和解释。【案情】北京鸭王烤鸭店有限公司(以下简称申请人)在餐饮服务上长期使用的“鸭王”商标已具有较高知名度,荣获多项荣誉。鸭王餐饮集团有限公司(以下简称被申请人)在餐饮服务上申请注册的第3083416号“鸭王”商标(以下称引证商标)属于对申请人在先使用商标的不正当抢注,目前正处于待确权状态。被异议商标的注册并未违反
The trademark law gives exclusivity to registered trademarks to a certain extent, but the coexistence of trademarks in special cases is indispensable. This article will be combined with “Duck King and Figure ” trademark opposition review case and based on “Trademark Law” the relevant provisions of the elaboration and interpretation. 【Case】 Beijing Duck King Roast Duck Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) has long been used in catering services “Duck Wang ” trademark has a higher profile, has won a number of honors. Duck King Restaurant Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) in the catering service to apply for registration No. 3083416 “duck king ” trademark (hereinafter referred to as the reference mark) belong to the applicant to use the trademark in advance of improper registration, Currently in the right to be confirmed state. The registration of the opposition trademark has not been violated